THE DREAMER PROJECT
Consciousness-First Principles
Working hypotheses for a hierarchy of perception shifts, drawn where science and spirituality overlap.
THE FOUNDATION
Premise
The Dreamer Project begins with a simple premise: reality is dreamed within one consciousness. If this is true, then the world is not acting on us but arising in us. A handful of frontier physicists, echoing great mystical lineages, suggest the same: consciousness is primary, multiplicity an appearance.
Experiment
From this premise, the Consciousness-First Principles emerged. They are not doctrines but working hypotheses: a series of perception shifts that test what changes when mind is seen as cause rather than world as cause.
Jump there →Extraction
We didn’t receive these as revelations; we extracted them. By cross-reading two streams—scientific models and spiritual insights—we noted where they pointed in the same direction. Each overlap became a principle, written as a testable shift (X → Y), ready to be tried in lived experiment.
Jump there →Principles
The hierarchy that follows outlines ten core flips in perception. Each one is a test: a way to tune the mind, re-position identity, and notice what dissolves when separation is treated as appearance rather than fact.
Jump there →
Premise
The Dreamer Project begins with a simple theory: reality is dreamed within one consciousness. If this is true, the world is not acting on us but arising in us.
If there is only one, then:
→ There are not two.
→ There are no opposites.
→ There is no “other,” no enemy, no them.
→ There is no conflict—no victory, no defeat.
→ There is no birth or death, no ultimate loss.
→ There is only consciousness.
From this premise, the Mind-First Principles emerged. They are not doctrines but hypotheses—perceptual flips that can be tested in daily life. Each one is both a thought experiment and a lived experiment, offering a way to re-see conflict, identity, and even life and death as appearances within mind itself.
Experiment
From the premise of one consciousness dreaming reality, the Mind-First Principles emerged. They are not doctrines but working hypotheses: shifts in perception that test what changes when mind is seen as cause rather than world as cause.
The Dreamer’s Framework: The project’s own scaffolding — the Dreamer Action Catalogue and Practice Hierarchy — organizes perception shifts into cues and ladders that make the theory testable in daily life.
Science: At the same time, frontier physics and neuroscience describe reality as interface, projection, or field. These theories suggest that what seems external may in fact be arising within awareness.
Spiritual Lineages: Mystical traditions across cultures point to the same recognition: separation is illusion, and oneness is the ground of being.
Though their languages differ, these streams converge on the same possibility: consciousness is primary, multiplicity is appearance.
Each principle is first a thought experiment, then a lived one. Together they form the intellectual backbone of the Dreamer Project: a bridge between idea and experience. You are invited to approach them not as rules, but as experiments — to test perception, to share reflection, to see what emerges.
Extraction: How Principles are Drawn
These principles are not received as revelations; they are being drawn out through comparison. Where science and spirituality point in the same direction, we sketch a provisional principle as a testable shift (X → Y).
From hunch to coordinates: The hypothesis begins as a hunch: what if mind comes first? To navigate, we keep marking coordinates by looking for patterns across disciplines—physics, neuroscience, contemplative practice, nondual texts.
Triangulation, not translation: Rather than reducing one lens into another, we place them side by side. A scientist’s model of perception as interface sits next to a mystic’s metaphor of the world as dream. Where they resonate, a line is drawn.
From candidates to testable shifts: Each resonance becomes a candidate principle: not a truth, but a shift to try. For example: World as cause → Mind as cause. These shifts are not final statements but invitations to test perception in daily life.
Living, not fixed: The outcome is not a system but a provisional map. Every principle remains dissolvable, subject to revision the moment experience contradicts it. What lasts is not the wording but the willingness to test.
MARTIN LENCLOS
“This isn’t a finished system, it’s a provisional map. Every principle can dissolve the moment experience proves otherwise. What matters is not the wording, but the willingness to test.”
THE HYPOTHESIS
Consciousness-First Principles
Extracted, not revealed. A working set of principles distilled from two streams—science and spirituality—tested here as part of the Dreamer Project.
The Dreamer Project does not begin with doctrine. It begins with extraction. By listening to both frontier science and enduring contemplative traditions, we draw out provisional principles—signals of what might follow if consciousness comes first.
Each principle takes the form of a shift: from an everyday illusion to a possible truth. They are not laws but working hypotheses, coordinates to test in perception. Where science points to mind as primary, and nondual traditions echo the same through intuition and practice, we map the overlap into principles fit for experiment. The invitation is simple: try the shift, notice what dissolves, and see what remains.
The principles also form a progression: They begin with cause and effect, move through separation, multiplicity, and identity, and culminate in love, peace, and awakening. Each step makes the next plausible, like a series of coordinates on a map — not a ladder to climb, but a rhythm of seeing differently.
-
The common assumption is that the world acts on us, that events push inward from outside. Yet both science and contemplative traditions suggest this picture may be reversed. Cognitive research reframes perception as construction, not mirror. Nondual practices speak of projection as the real engine of experience. The resonance is clear: what we call “the world” may be the effect, not the cause.
Explore through tuning practices that flip the source code of experience. -
We are conditioned to believe in private minds and separate lives. But physics speaks of entanglement and synchrony, while mystics call separation the central error. Both point to the same hypothesis: what looks divided may only be appearance within one field.
Explore through relational undoing that dissolves the illusion of “them.” -
Crowds, nations, histories—everything points to “the many.” Yet simulation theories and unified-field models imply one system expressing itself in countless forms. Contemplatives echo the same through practices of seeing oneself in the other. The suggestion: multiplicity may be dreamt, a play of masks within one mind.
Explore through visualizations that shift crowds into dreamscapes of the one. -
We cling to name, story, and body as who we are. Neuroscience frames self as construction; sages say “I am not a body, I am free.” Both suggest identity is not the mask but the field in which masks appear.
Explore through awareness shifts that practice loosening identity into presence. -
Birth and death seem like bookends. Physics hints that time itself may not be fundamental; contemplatives treat death as a transition in the same mind. Together they invite the hypothesis: being never begins or ends.
Explore through visualizations that trace the thread of being through all forms. -
We usually treat love as an exchange — I give you mine, you give me yours. Yet studies show empathy works through shared fields, and spiritual lineages describe love as the recognition of one self in many forms. Love isn’t a transaction but the moment of seeing: the same self looking back through different eyes.
Explore through mantras and partner practices that train recognition instead of exchange. -
Conflict feels undeniable: nations at war, arguments at home, inner struggle. But science shows conflict arises from dualistic cognition, while contemplatives show it dissolves in silence. The possibility: peace is the default—conflict the overlay.
Explore through compass practices that pause and lean toward stillness. -
The reflex is to correct, convince, or fix the world. Neuroscience and placebo studies show perception shapes behavior; contemplatives insist correction belongs to the mind, not the form. Both converge on the same hypothesis: healing begins within perception.
Explore through thought experiments and relational undoings that shift correction inward. -
Culture frames awakening as a prize—something to earn. Research on peak states shows the opposite: awakening often comes as subtraction, not addition. Mystics say truth returns when seeking ends. The suggestion: awakening is not gained but remembered.
Explore through mantra and release practices that undo striving and return to presence. -
Stories of doom, confusion, and collapse make it seem as if humanity is adrift. Yet science increasingly frames the brain as a dream-making prediction engine, while mystics insist we are dreaming, not lost. The shift to test: what if confusion itself is only dream-script, and recognition is already here?
Explore through awareness shifts that treat daily events as dream clues.
These shifts of perception are not rules but hypotheses. Each one is a candidate to be tested — through I’m / We’re The Dreamer tuning, the Dreamer’s Compass, or simply by pausing to look again. The hierarchy is not a ladder to climb, but a reminder of what the consciousness-first hypothesis invites us to examine.
Explore the practice families — Awareness Shifts, Compass Practices, and Relational Undoing — and test how these principles play out in daily life.
JOURNAL ANNOTATION — Sept 8, 2025
Why Shifts of Perception Matter.
The shift is so radical. What do the spiritual traditions say?
Across traditions, perception is treated as the pivot. In Advaita Vedanta, the world is framed as misperception — a play of forms in the single field of Being. Zen masters use koans to dissolve the usual lens. Daoist texts describe tension as illusion, undone in the flow of nonresistance. More recently, A Course in Miracles defines reality itself as a perceptual error, to be corrected by recognizing oneness. Eckhart Tolle reframes the present moment as doorway rather than state — perception clarified, not achieved.
If this reality is projected in mind like a dream, then the only leverage we have is vision: the way we frame what we see, and the identity we take ourselves to be. We cannot fix the dream by rearranging its images. The most direct result comes when the shift happens at the level of sight itself — from world as cause to mind as cause, from otherness to interlinked selfhood.
Why is this so important for a consciousness-first experiment? Because it sets the scope. If we are one undifferentiated awareness, then anything that seems to divide us — body, history, role, even thought — belongs to the dream of separation. The only thing that can actually change is perception itself.
Up-layering works like this: we notice the surface story, pause, and allow attention to move a layer higher. In that moment, confidence builds. We begin to act from a loving awareness that reflects unicity, without forcing, without imposing, without declaring. We simply live as if the same mind is looking through every set of eyes.
For further reading, see the Bibliothèque of the Dreamer — from classic nondual texts to modern works like The Power of Now. These traditions converge on one insight: perception shifts are not decoration; they are the experiment itself.